Social and Psychological Conflicts at Work: Why They Arise and How They Shape Our Work Lives
(A Psychology Blog Post)
We often imagine workplace conflict as loud arguments or visible disagreements. In reality, most conflicts at work are quiet, internal, and relational—playing out in thoughts, emotions, silences, and subtle behaviours. These are social and psychological conflicts, and they deeply shape how people feel, perform, and relate at work.
From a psychological lens, such conflicts are not accidents or personal failures; they are predictable outcomes of human interaction in structured social systems.
Understanding Social and Psychological Conflict
Social conflict at work
Social conflict arises from relationships, group dynamics, power structures, roles, and social identities within the organisation.
Psychological conflict at work
Psychological conflict refers to internal tensions—between needs, values, emotions, self-concept, and external expectations—that employees experience while performing their roles.
Often, these two forms of conflict are intertwined:
An unresolved psychological conflict inside an individual often appears as a social conflict with others.
The Psychological Roots of Workplace Conflict
1. Conflict Between Needs and Organisational Demands
Human beings carry fundamental psychological needs—belonging, autonomy, competence, recognition. When organisational structures frustrate these needs, conflict emerges.
The human relations perspective, associated with Elton Mayo, reminds us that employees are not machines; they are emotional beings seeking meaning and connection.
📌 Example:
An employee who feels ignored by their supervisor may outwardly comply but inwardly disengage—leading to passive resistance, withdrawal, or interpersonal friction.
2. Identity and Role Conflicts
Work is not just what we do—it becomes who we are.
Drawing from Henri Tajfel, individuals derive a sense of identity and self-worth from group membership (department, profession, rank).
Psychological conflict arises when:
- Professional identity is threatened
- Role expectations are unclear or contradictory
- Personal values clash with organisational norms
📌 Example:
A counsellor or psychologist asked to prioritise administrative targets over client wellbeing may experience deep internal conflict, which later manifests as burnout or frustration with management.
3. Perception, Attribution, and Misunderstanding
Much workplace conflict exists not in reality, but in interpretation.
According to Fritz Heider, people tend to explain others’ behaviour by blaming personality rather than situational pressures.
📌 Example:
- “She ignored my email because she doesn’t respect me”
- “He is difficult, not overworked”
Such attributions slowly erode trust and create invisible relational rifts.
4. Emotional Suppression and Unexpressed Feelings
Many organisations reward emotional restraint and discourage open expression of discomfort.
From a psychoanalytic perspective rooted in Sigmund Freud, suppressed emotions do not disappear—they resurface as:
- Irritability
- Sarcasm
- Passive aggression
- Psychosomatic complaints
📌 Psychological truth:
What is not expressed verbally often appears behaviourally.
5. Power, Authority, and Psychological Safety
Power differences are inevitable in organisations—but psychological conflict arises when power is exercised without empathy.
Research on psychological safety highlights that employees experience less conflict when they feel:
- Safe to speak
- Free to disagree
- Protected from humiliation
In high power-distance contexts, such as many Indian organisations, silence is often misread as agreement—while internally, resentment grows.
6. Group Dynamics and “Us vs Them” Thinking
Social conflict often escalates at the group level:
- Departments compete
- Teams blame each other
- Seniors vs juniors
- Management vs staff
According to social psychology, group boundaries intensify conflict by amplifying in-group loyalty and out-group suspicion.
📌 Result:
Conflict shifts from “What went wrong?” to “Who is wrong?”
7. Stress, Burnout, and Emotional Spillover
Psychological conflicts increase under conditions of:
- Chronic workload
- Job insecurity
- Lack of control
- Role overload
The frustration–aggression hypothesis explains how blocked goals generate anger, which may be displaced onto colleagues rather than systems.
📌 Example:
An employee unable to challenge unfair policies may redirect anger toward teammates.
Why These Conflicts Matter
Social and psychological conflicts at work lead to:
- Emotional exhaustion
- Reduced job satisfaction
- Poor teamwork
- Increased absenteeism
- Quiet quitting
But when acknowledged and addressed, they can also:
- Clarify unmet needs
- Improve communication
- Strengthen relationships
- Promote organisational learning
Moving Toward Healthier Workplaces
From a psychological standpoint, healthier workplaces:
- Normalise emotional expression
- Encourage reflective dialogue
- Reduce fear-based control
- Value empathy alongside efficiency
Conflict does not disappear in healthy organisations—it becomes manageable, meaningful, and growth-oriented.
Closing Reflection
Workplace conflicts are rarely just about tasks, deadlines, or policies. They are about people navigating identity, emotion, power, and belonging within social systems. Understanding social and psychological conflicts at work allows us to move from blame to insight—and from reaction to reflection.
When organisations learn to listen psychologically, conflicts stop being threats and start becoming teachers.
Posts
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment